The Ultimate Proof for God…?

Many people ask if there is one ultimate evidence or proof for God. Is there one proof that explains:

  • Why Christians believe in God
  • Why Christians believe that God created the world
  • Why Christians believe the bible as we have it is the word of God
  • Why Christians believe that all of the men who wrote the bible were inspired by God
  • Why Christians believe that Jesus is who He claimed to be
  • Why Christians believe that Jesus died on the cross for me
  • Why Christians believe Jesus is the ONLY way to Heaven
  • Why Christians believe Christianity is the Only true religion?

I believe there are two ways of approaching this question, depending on the person that asks:

  1. If the person does not seem open to the truth and is just looking for reasons to justify their unbelief, no amount of evidence will satisfy them because they do not have a desire to learn truth. They either have a bias or have many presuppositions that will make it near impossible for them to accept things that the theist would offer. For instance, if someone believes in the philosophies of naturalism or materialism, they believe that the natural, or material world is ALL there is. Because of this they may not be willing to accept anything that you may offer that deals with the supernatural, such as miracles. For these  people, I usually do not provide evidence in a way that they can be the judge over God and blaspheme Him in doing so. The reason is: the Bible teaches that everyone is already without excuse for rejecting God, solely on the basis of suppressing the truth of His existence by their sin. This suppression of the truth leads them to ignore the evidence of God’s deity and power in creation, the historical evidence of how God cared for Israel, delivered them from Egypt, and gave them the promised land. Their suppression of the truth leads them to reject the many prophecies in the Old Testament that speak of the Messiah, His deity, the miracles He would do in His life, His sacrificial death in fulfilling the OT sacrificial system, and His resurrection. All of these things are spoken of in the scriptures and were fulfilled in His life. These things were all seen by men (eyewitness testimony). These are great proofs for the existence of God, but they are rejected because of an unwillingness to accept the historical accounts because the miraculous is “impossible” to the skeptic. So the best proof to give these skeptics is to show them that the worldview that they are using to examine the evidence is incoherent and illogical. Both naturalism and materialism are self-refuting. They need to see that their worldview as unbelievers cannot account for the necessary preconditions of life and intelligibility, such as reason, knowing they are in reality, objective truth and morality, the uniformity of nature, and the immaterial, universal, unchanging laws of logic, science, physics, mathematics, etc. All of these laws transcend time and cannot be accounted for from a worldview that rejects the God of the Bible. Since these necessary things for understanding life cannot be accounted for in atheism, atheism is invalidated, and theism is validated. If you have only two options (atheism and theism) and there is not a third option (Law of Excluded Middle), disproving one proves the other. Theism is proved by the impossibility of the contrary. The Christian worldview can account for all these things. For more information on these arguments, you can go to my website for more information (atheism page and presuppositional apologetics page)
  2. If (and only if) a person is actually open to considering the evidence, there are many different things you can share with them, but if you only had one opportunity, I would share with them the following:

The Resurrection: The Ultimate Proof for Jesus, the Authority of Scripture, and Creation

There is one main reason why I have the faith I do: Because I believe that the evidence points to the FACT that Jesus Christ rose from the grave. The Christian faith stands or falls on the historicity of this one event. Did Jesus rise from the tomb, fulfilling the Old Testament prophecies that said He would, along with the prophecies that He Himself made in His life.

If Jesus rose from His tomb:

  • His claims about Himself are true. He really is the Son of the Living God. He really was God incarnate, the One with ALL authority on heaven and earth who will be the judge of all men (Matthew 28:19-20; Acts 17:30)
  • He is the lamb of God who died for the sins of the world, including your sins and my sins (John 1:29)
  • The Apostles and Prophets who spoke on His behalf (who gave us the NT) were from God. They were inspired by God, as Jesus said they would be (John 14:26, 15:26, 16:7-15)
  • The Old Testament is shown to be from God also, proven by Jesus’ claims that it was and His use of it with authority.
  • Jesus’ speaking of Adam and Eve as real historical figures, the beginning of time and creation, the flood of Noah, etc. show that those events really did happen as recorded in the book of Genesis.

If Jesus did not rise from His tomb:

  • He is by far the biggest fraud that this world has known. He wouldn’t even be a good man, or a good prophet.
  • His Apostles and Prophets were liars, and were willing to even die for a lie.
  • Everything that we believe from the New Testament (and possibly the Old Testament) is a lie!
  • Our faith is worthless and we are still in our sins.
  • We are wasting our time being Christians if the resurrection didn’t happen! We should as Paul stated just “eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.”

Christianity crumbles if the resurrection did not happen. New Testament preachers of the gospel were more than willing to allow everything to rest on this one event happening.

Did Jesus really rise from the dead?

The evidence that we have is substantial. We have historical eyewitness testimony that must be taken into account by any honest seeker of truth.

  • “For we did not follow cunningly devised fables when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty” (2 Peter 1:16)
  • “And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you may believe (John 19:35)
  • “Brothers, I may say to you with confidence about the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would set one of his descendants on his throne, 31 he foresaw and spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption. 32 This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses.” (Acts 2:29-32)

Overview of the eyewitness accounts

After Jesus’ death, Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea buried the body of Jesus in the tomb of Joseph, a tomb in which no one had ever been placed. A huge stone was put at the entrance of the tomb, a stone that probably weighed somewhere between 1,000-2,000 pounds. A guard was placed at the tomb so that the disciples could not come to steal the body. Yet on that third day of His death, the witnesses aledge that when the women came to the tomb, they found the stone rolled away. His burial garments were in the tomb, but the body was gone. Then an angel appeared to them, asking, “why do you seek the living among the dead. He is not here. He is risen. Go and tell his disciples.” The women went and told the disciples, but the disciples unfortunately didn’t believe them. 2 disciples, one of which was Peter, went to the tomb, finding it how the women said it was.

Then we see Jesus make His first appearances to witnesses. He first appeared to Mary Magdalene. Then to the women that were with her. Then he appeared to 2 men on the road to Emmaus, then to Simon Peter and the other apostles without Thomas on the day of the supposed resurrection.

Then a week later, Jesus appeared again to His disciples with Thomas present. Thomas, who doubted at first, was convinced, fell before Jesus and said, My Lord and My God!” He later appeared to the apostles at the Sea of Galilee and to James His brother, who at one point did not believe in Jesus, but was convinced by the resurrection that Jesus was who he claimed to be. Paul states that at one time over 500 people at once saw Jesus resurrected.

Luke’s account in Acts says that Jesus appeared to them many times over a 40 day period, teaching them about the kingdom of God. Then after this period of time, Jesus gave them the great commission, telling them to proclaim the message of salvation through His death, burial, and resurrection, a message that they were willing to give their lives for! Then, after giving the great commission, they watched as Jesus ascended into heaven.

Paul

There was at least one more appearance according to the testimony. He was on his way to Damascus with letters from the Jewish leaders giving him authority to find Christians in that city and to arrest them and bring them back to Jerusalem. But one the way to Damascus, a bright light appeared, Paul fell to the ground, and Jesus appeared to him, bringing about his conversion. Paul who was an enemy of the Lord, became an Apostle of the Lord, and proclaimed the gospel in much of the known world of his time.

These things are what we see in the testimony of the New Testament.

Skeptics’ theories

But there are modern skeptics that do not want to believe this evidence. They come up with many theories to try to say that Jesus was not resurrected, all of which can be put into 2 categories. There are “occupied tomb theories” and there are “empty tomb theories.” These are the 2 possibilities. Either the tomb had the body or it didn’t.

Occupied tomb theories

The first skeptic response is this:

“Resurrection is not possible. Miracles are not possible.

We cannot see them now, so they didn’t happen then. Because of this, Jesus never left the tomb.

Resurrection is “unscientific.” It cannot be seen or tested. It is true that we do not see people rising from the dead after three days today. We have no empirical evidence that this is possible. Jesus’ resurrection cannot be perceived with our senses today.

But I’ll tell you, I believe those who make this argument are being intellectually dishonest. It is true that the resurrection is outside of the empirical realm. No one here has ever seen it. But there is still eyewitness testimony that people who believe this are not willing to even look at. They ignore it. They do not discuss it. There is eyewitness testimony, which is evidence. Men who saw Jesus, ate with Him, heard Him teach over a 40 day period after His resurrection. Those things were in the empirical realm. I believe that is intellectually dishonest to say miracles are impossible if many eyewitnesses saw the miracle (even up to 500 witnesses that could have been spoken to at that time).

“All of this was legend.

Everything that we see is a legendary account that arose over a long period of time.

That’s an easy way to try to dismiss everything. But according to Acts 2, the resurrection was no legend, it was a focal point of the first sermon preached on the day of Pentecost. The resurrection was part of the gospel message from the very beginning. Paul said in 1 Corinthians 15 that the resurrection was of first importance. It was something he preached everywhere he went. all of the evidence indicates the opposite of this theory that it was a legend.

Also, unbelieving Jews in the first century did not make such a claim. Even the enemies of that time knew that the resurrection was not a legend.

“They went to the wrong tomb.”

Jesus’ body was in a different tomb? Everyone who supposedly saw the empty tomb went to the wrong tomb. Nobody knew the right tomb. Joseph of Arimathea didn’t know the right tomb? The enemies who placed the guard at the tomb went to the wrong tomb? This just doesn’t make sense.

This also doesn’t deal with the post-resurrection appearances

“They eyewitnesses hallucinated.”

More than 500 people all had the same hallucination? Every single person who saw the Lord had hallucinations? And they just stopped after 40 days? How about Paul? he just hallucinated seeing Jesus on the road to Damascus? This doesn’t make sense. It has also been proved that hallucinations can only happen in individual occurrences. It is not possible that 500 people, or even 12 people at once could have the same hallucination.

“ Maybe it was all a case of mistaken identity.”

They wanted to see Jesus so badly, that they just happened to see someone who looked like Him, and after this they went all over the world claiming that Jesus rose from the dead. This does not make sense when looking at the eyewitness testimonies either. They ate with him and spoke with Him on numerous occasions. It was not possible that it was a case of mistaken identity.

All of these occupied tomb theories just hold no water. They all have the same problem, one that I mentioned already. Unbelieving Jews, the enemies of Christ, never made such claims. They knew that the body was not in the tomb that it was put into. These people so badly wanted to disprove the resurrection, but never advocated any of these theories.

It is a historical fact that the tomb was empty.

Empty tomb theories

“Somebody stole the body.”

  • The Disciples Stole the Body: This is what the Jewish authorities came up with. How did they get past the guards? Some say that the guards all fell asleep on guard duty, which would have cost them their lives. So are you telling me that not one of the guards woke up as Jesus’ disciples tip-toed to the tomb, quietly removed the huge stone at the tomb, went into the tomb, unwrapped the body, leaving the wrappings behind, then carried the body out, all of this without waking the guards? That just is not possible. I have seen some heavy sleepers, but this would be ridiculous. Up to the point of Jesus’ death, they did not even understand the importance of the resurrection, nor did they have the courage to do such a thing. Other questions: What did they have to gain by stealing the body and preaching the message that they did? Torture, Imprisonment, death? No one would be willing to die for what they know is a lie! Many people die for what they believe to be true, but not for a lie? How do you explain Paul’s conversion; his willingness to suffer?
  • The Jewish or Roman Authorities Stole the Body: Why? Wouldn’t you make it look like His body was resurrected? Also if they did take the body, why did they not just produce the body when the disciples were out proclaiming the resurrection of Christ? They could have stamped out the church in an instant by doing so! But why didn’t they? Because they didn’t have the body.

“Jesus didn’t die on the cross (the swoon theory- Acoma)”

Jesus, after he was put in the tomb, revived, and somehow got out of the tomb in His weakened state.

Did the Roman soldiers mess up at their job of execution? Were they wrong in coming to the conclusion he was dead when they thrust a spear into his side on the cross? Didn’t anyone, including Joseph and Nicodemus realize as they were preparing His body for burial that He was still breathing? Jesus had to survive massive blood loss, torture, and a stab wound in his side. In addition, while suffering from the wounds on his back, in his side, and in his feet and hands, Jesus had to roll the stone away (which normally would take several men to accomplish).

Conclusions

These are the best theories skeptics have been able to come up with over the past 2000 years, but not a single one of them makes logical sense when you with an open mind consider the evidence. So each one of us need to make a decision. Did Jesus really rise from the dead? Was his tomb really empty? What does the evidence say? If you come to the conclusion that Jesus was not raised from the tomb, which one of these alternative theories do you want to defend as you theory? Do you have one that I haven’t heard of yet?

I affirm to you that the evidence proves that Jesus Christ is the Son of the Living God. He is the Christ. He was raised from the dead. This is why I am a Christian. This is why I submit to His authority in every area of my life.

You must make a decision. You are without excuse for your sin and for not obeying the gospel of Jesus Christ. Most people think their ticket to Heaven is to be a good person. Would you consider yourself a good person? Have you ever lied? Looked with lust? Hated someone? Stolen? Taken God’s name in vain? If you have done these things once, then you are a liar, an adulterer (Matt. 5:28), a murderer (1 John 3:15), a thief, and a blasphemer (not a good person). God will not overlook your crimes. You are deserving of God’s wrath in His eternal prison of Hell. But this is not what He desires for you. God sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to this earth to be a sacrifice for your sins. He died for you and was raised from His tomb by God so you can have the hope of eternal life.

The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, 31 because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.” (Acts 17:30-31)

See also: Paul’s Testimony of the Resurrection: Evidence for Christ

A Form of Godliness

Scripture says that some people have the appearance of godliness, but deny its power. (2 Tim 3:5).

As you look out into the religious world today, there are so many people that go to church and claim to be the people of God, when in reality you can see clearly that they are not once you get to know them. They try to appear to the world to be religious when their hearts do not really belong to the Lord. They have not been regenerated. They have not been born again.

Jesus says, “”Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God… unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God” (John 3:3,5). This is a serious statement that Christ makes that we must consider. There is no hope for anyone to get to heaven who is putting on a show; anyone that has not allowed their life to be impacted(and changed) by the truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Romans 1:16).

The reason I have titled this article “Catholicism: A Form of Godliness Without Power” is because this is one thing I have noticed amongst people that I know that are Catholics and amongst those who claim to be Catholic when I am out sharing the gospel. It seems like, without fail, every time I ask a Catholic whether or not they have been born again, they say no. Some of them may be going to mass every week (some even 5-7 times per week), but they have not allowed the Gospel to penetrate their hearts so that they may be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth. Instead, they trust in a church that has no power in itself to save, no power to forgive sins, and who does not speak for Jesus Christ.

Beyond this, we see in the Roman Catholic Church , an organization that puts so much focus on appearances. The pope, cardinals, bishops, and priests may wear the most elaborate clothing to set themselves apart from the laity. The Catholic Church builds amazing buildings that probably cost a ton of money, and build many statues of “saints” so that their people honor them and by bow before them. But with all of this work on appearances, these men lift themselves up beyond what is taught in scripture, give themselves authority which Christ didn’t give them, and have not been regenerated (born again) by the teaching of the gospel.

One thing is for sure: I believe the gospel is powerful enough to save these men. It is able to convict them to become new creatures in Christ. The gospel can lead them to leave their sin and call Him Lord.

Next time you share the gospel with a Catholic, try asking them this question: “Are you born again?” It will be a good way to show them where they stand before the Lord.

Also, ask yourself the same question. Have you allowed the Gospel of Christ to transform you? Or do you look the same as you have your whole life? If you cannot point to a time in your life where Christ transformed your life; your thinking about sin, the world, and yourself; or has led you to trust only in His authority as your Lord, you probably have not been born again. This means, once again, that you will not enter the kingdom of God. Please examine yourself, to make sure you are in the faith that was once for all time delivered to the saints (Jude 3).

Are We Born Sinners? An Examination of “Total Inherited Depravity”

New Microsoft Office PowerPoint PresentationThis article is an examination of the popular doctrine of “total inherited depravity” or “original sin.” This has been a topic I have been studying for quite some time now, considering different texts that proponents of this doctrine use to show it is taught in scripture. After studying these things on my own, I have decided to write about the conclusions that I came to from scripture. If you disagree with any of the arguments that I make below, please send me your thoughts, comments, or questions so I can consider them and test the conclusions I came to.

God Made Man Upright

Eccl 7:27-29 – Behold, this is what I found, says the Preacher, while adding one thing to another to find the scheme of things— 28 which my soul has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found. 29 See, this alone I found, that God made man upright, but they have sought out many schemes.”

Solomon is speaking of things that he has observed in his life under the sun. One of these things he has seen is: God has made man upright, but they have sought out sinful things. This text seems to be referring to each individual person, and not Adam specifically. Each person is made by God upright, but sin against Him and seek to do their own will.

God Forms the Baby in the Womb

Psalm 139:13-16 “For You formed my inward parts; You wove me in my mother’s womb. 14 I will give thanks to You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; Wonderful are Your works, And my soul knows it very well. 15 My frame was not hidden from You, When I was made in secret, And skillfully wrought in the depths of the earth; 16 Your eyes have seen my unformed substance; And in Your book were all written The days that were ordained for me, When as yet there was not one of them.”

The baby in the womb is a work of God. He “wove” the child, and made the child. Does God make and form a sinful child in the womb or an innocent one? Instead of being fearfully and wonderfully made, was David sinfully and corruptly made?

Be Like Little Children

Matthew 18:3 "Truly I say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Matthew 19:13-14 “Then some children were brought to Him so that He might lay His hands on them and pray; and the disciples rebuked them. 14 But Jesus said, "Let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to Me; for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these."

According to those who hold the doctrine of original sin, children are all little sinners. They say, “just go to Chuck E. Cheese and sit there for awhile. You will see that children are rotten sinners!” This argument presupposes why they are ‘sinners.’ It’s begging the question. It assumes they are sinners because they were born this way. There is an equally valid possibility that children can be taught to sin through nurture, by lack of training and discipline, or by giving into temptation as you and I do. This also raises the question, “should we label a child a ‘sinner’ if they do not have a knowledge of good and evil and ignorant of the consequences of their choices?” There is reason to debate this.

Again, Jesus does not say that children are rotten sinners. He says that we need to be like little children. Is He saying that we need to be sinners?

Children are innocent/ Have No Knowledge of Sin

Deuteronomy 1:39  “Moreover, your little ones who you said would become a prey, and your sons, who this day have no knowledge of good or evil, shall enter there, and I will give it to them and they shall possess it.”

Isaiah 7:14-16 "Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel . 15 "He will eat curds and honey at the time He knows enough to refuse evil and choose good. 16 "For before the boy will know enough to refuse evil and choose good, the land whose two kings you dread will be forsaken.

These two verses show that children are not sinners. They have no knowledge of sin. They are ignorant of good and evil. They are not making sinful choices in rebellion to God. The prophecy of Jesus Christ in Isaiah 7 (quoted above) shows that Jesus was just as the children of Israel. Neither had the ability to choose between good and evil. They do not qualify to be sinners.

Sin is a choice to disobey God and His law.

1 John 3:4 – “Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness.”

Sin is a breaking of the law of God. It is not meeting the standard, falling short of the glory of God (Rom 3:23)

Did Jesus Have a Sinful Nature?

Hebrews 2:14  -   “Therefore, since the children share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil”

Jesus had a human nature just like us. Jesus shared in the flesh, "the same." The text does not say He was like us, except for the sinful nature.

Hebrews 2:17 -  “ Therefore, He had to be made like His brethren in all things, so that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.”

Jesus was made like his brethren in ALL THINGS!!!! If He wasn’t, He was not the perfect and faithful high priest that this verse is talking about. If we have a sinful nature from birth, Jesus had to also.

Hebrews 4:15 -  “For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin.”

Our high priest can sympathize with us. Calvinists say that we are tempted by a sinful nature that we have had since birth. Jesus was tempted in every way we are. Was He tempted by a sinful nature as we are? If not, He wasn’t tempted in ALL ways as we are. This shows that men do not have a sinful nature from birth.

If Jesus were fully god and fully man (just as we are), why doesn’t he have a sinful nature? The answer is: He doesn’t, because men don’t have one either from birth. There is a theory that the sinful nature is passed through the man, but there is no scriptural evidence at all.

Sin Transferred to Descendants?

Heb 7:9-10 “One might even say that Levi himself, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, 10 for he was still in the loins of his ancestor when Melchizedek met him.”

This verse is commonly used to prove that sin can be transferred to the next generation through the father because we are all still ‘in the loins” of our fathers as Levi was, and just as Levi paid tithes through Abraham, we sin through our fathers. Those who use this verse to say this miss the point of the entire verse. The verse does not even mention sin. It mentions a good thing being done and “passed” to a descendant. It actually teaches a contrary thing than proponents of the “sinful at birth” doctrine are trying to use it for. IF we use their logic in approaching this text, can we say that since our parents do good things in service to God, we have those things put onto our account? No. This is not what the text is teaching. The point of the text is not to teach how the acts of our ancestors are put onto our accounts. The Bible does not teach such a thing. It actually contradicts it (Ezekiel 18).

Sinful at Birth?

Psalm 58:3 "The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray from birth, speaking lies."

The word for estranged means to turn aside, which means they perform an action. The verse is not saying a person is sinful before leaving the womb. Do people speak from the womb? NO. This verse is meant to be hyperbole.

Psalm 51:5 "Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin my mother conceived me."

Some modern translations say “I was a sinner at birth,” making the focus of the verse David. But all literal translations say that the mother was the sinner. It may also be saying that the sexual act that his mother conceived him with was sinful. Either way, David in this psalm is using hyperbole to show how sinful he is because of his sins with Bathsheba and Uriah. To say these two verses are teaching original sin misses two things, 1) the poetic nature of what is being said (hyperbole), and 2) the Jews never interpreted these verses to teach original sin.

By Nature Children of Wrath

Ephesians 2:1-3 “ And you were dead in your trespasses and sins, 2 in which you formerly walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience. 3 Among them we too all formerly lived in the lusts of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and of the mind , and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest”

Those who believe in the sinful nature take the last part of verse three to prove their belief, but completely disregard the first 2 ½ verses that show WHY we are children of wrath. It is because of our practices. We walked in trespasses and sins (vv1-2), and we lived in the lusts of the flesh and indulged in our desires (v3). Remember, we must allow the context define what Paul is talking about as the “sinful nature.” Within the many definitions of the Greek word for “nature” is the definition that something becomes ‘natural’ through practice:

nature – “a mode of feeling and acting which by long habit has become nature”: ημεν φυσει τεκνα οργης, by (our depraved) nature we were exposed to the wrath of God, Ephesians 2:3 (this meaning is evident from the preceding context, and stands in contrast with the change of heart and life wrought through Christ by the blessing of divine grace”—Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon

Thayer defines the word in this text as something we do by practice that becomes habit, and he shows from the context why this is the definition of the word out of the possible choices. This is one of the 4 definitions he gives for this Greek word. The context is used to define it correctly.

Romans 2:14  -  “For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law.”

Gentiles can “by nature” do the law. This verse contradicts the doctrine of original sin that says that man is incapable of doing non-sinful things. This verse says they can by nature follow the law even though they do not have it.

Slaves of Sin

Romans 6:12-20 “ Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its lusts, 13 and do not go on presenting the members of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God. 14 For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law but under grace. 15 What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? May it never be! 16 Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness? 17 But thanks be to God that though you were slaves of sin, you became obedient from the heart to that form of teaching to which you were committed, 18 and having been freed from sin, you became slaves of righteousness. 19 I am speaking in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh. For just as you presented your members as slaves to impurity and to lawlessness, resulting in further lawlessness, so now present your members as slaves to righteousness, resulting in sanctification. For when you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness.”

Nowhere in the text is it mentioned that we are born slaves of sin. Verses 12 -20 shows that sin becomes our master if we let it reign in our bodies. We choose to present ourselves to sin and to be its slave. Once again, remember the context of the verse to define what a verse means.

John  8:31-36 “So Jesus was saying to those Jews who had believed Him, "If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; 32 and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free." 33 They answered Him, "We are Abraham’s descendants and have never yet been enslaved to anyone; how is it that You say, ‘You will become free’?" 34 Jesus answered them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin. 35 "The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever. 36 "So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed.”

He that sins is a slave to sin. Jesus doesn’t say those who are born are slaves to sin, but that we become a slave of sin by practicing sin.

Did Cain Have the Ability to Master Sin?

Gen 4:7 "If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door; and its desire is for you, but you must master it."

Cain is told by God that he had the ability to master sin. He was not a slave to it after the fall. Temptation was there. Sin was at the door. But Cain could choose not to do it AND be the master over it. Only when you practice sin do you become its slave (Rom 6:12-20- discussed above).

Wicked Hearts

Jeremiah 17:9-10  "The heart is more deceitful than all else And is desperately sick; Who can understand it? 10 "I, the LORD, search the heart, I test the mind, Even to give to each man according to his ways, According to the results of his deeds.”

This verse teaches what it says. Everyone agrees that the heart of man is sinful and sick. We disagree as to why. Some believe it is because they were born that way, which I disagree with. Some believe they are sinful and sick because they with knowledge practice sin (disobey the law of God).

Mark 7:21-23 “"For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, 22 deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. 23 "All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man."

Is Jesus saying here that the heart is sinful and evil from birth? No. He says out of the heart of “men” come evil things. This verse does not even deal with the question of why the hearts of men are like this. We can only assume this based on what we already believe.

Sinful from our Youth

Jeremiah 3:25 “Let us lie down in our shame, and let our dishonor cover us. For we have sinned against the Lord our God, we and our fathers, from our youth even to this day, and we have not obeyed the voice of the Lord our God.”

Gen 8:21 The LORD smelled the soothing aroma; and the LORD said to Himself, "I will never again curse the ground on account of man, for the intent of man’s heart is evil from his youth; and I will never again destroy every living thing, as I have done.

The Jeremiah passage is giving a time reference (from youth till today). It does not say “from birth.” There is a Hebrew word that means ‘from the womb’ or ‘from birth’. The author doesn’t use it. There is also a word for baby that is not used in the text.

Genesis 46:34 uses the same phrase. “Your servants have been keepers of livestock from our youth even until now, both we and our fathers.” Does this mean that the sons of Jacob were shepherds from birth? It is inconsistent to say no and then to say that the above verses are referring to a condition from birth.

None Who Do Good?

"THERE IS NONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE; 11 THERE IS NONE WHO UNDERSTANDS, THERE IS NONE WHO SEEKS FOR GOD; 12 ALL HAVE TURNED ASIDE, TOGETHER THEY HAVE BECOME USELESS; THERE IS NONE WHO DOES GOOD, THERE IS NOT EVEN ONE." 13 "THEIR THROAT IS AN OPEN GRAVE, WITH THEIR TONGUES THEY KEEP DECEIVING," "THE POISON OF ASPS IS UNDER THEIR LIPS"; 14 "WHOSE MOUTH IS FULL OF CURSING AND BITTERNESS"; 15 "THEIR FEET ARE SWIFT TO SHED BLOOD, 16 DESTRUCTION AND MISERY ARE IN THEIR PATHS, 17 AND THE PATH OF PEACE THEY HAVE NOT KNOWN." 18 "THERE IS NO FEAR OF GOD BEFORE THEIR EYES." (Romans 3:10-18)

Who are the “all” who have turned aside” and the “none” who are righteous and not seeking God that this verse is talking about? This very text answers who it is talking about. It says that these people “HAVE TURNED ASIDE.” This is an action that someone does. An infant, who does not have the ability to break the law of God, is unable to “turn aside.” They have become useless, which means there was a time in which they were not useless. After turning aside, they became useless. The context of this passage is teaching that all men are under sin because “their throats are open graves,” they “use their tongues to deceive,” their “mouths are full of cursing and bitterness,” their “feet are swift to shed blood,” etc. These are all actions that men are guilty of, showing that they are under sin. Are infants guilty of any of these sins mentioned in the context of the verses 10-12 that say that all have turned aside and have become useless?

All shut up under disobedience?

”Just as you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may now receive mercy. 32 For God has consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all.” (Romans 11:30-32)

This text is saying that God is showing mercy on those who were disobedient. These people sinned. The verse does not say they were born this way. Verse 32 is just finishing the thought of verses 30-31 that clearly show that they all sinned. The same is the case with the following Galatians passage:

“But the Scripture has shut up everyone under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. 24 Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.” (Gal 3:22-24)

This text is saying that God is showing mercy on those who were disobedient. These people sinned. The verse does not say they were born this way. Verse 32 is just finishing the thought of verses 30-31 that clearly show that they all sinned. The same is the case with the Galatians passage. The context of the Galatians passage you quoted are showing that the Law gives men the knowledge of their sinfulness so they can be led to the Savior.

No man living is righteous

“Hear my prayer, O LORD, Give ear to my supplications! Answer me in Your faithfulness, in Your righteousness! 2 And do not enter into judgment with Your servant, For in Your sight no man living is righteous. 3 For the enemy has persecuted my soul; He has crushed my life to the ground; He has made me dwell in dark places, like those who have long been dead.” (Psalms 143:1-3)

I agree that no MAN that is living is righteous without the mercy of God. What does the condition of men have to do with infants again? David in the context is talking about his sins and the sins of his enemies that are persecuting him. He is not talking about infants. We must be careful to not read into the text things that are not being spoken of in it.

We are liars if we say we have no sin

“If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth; 7 but if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us.” (1 John 1:6-10)

Who is the apostle John talking to in the context? Christians! If we as Christians say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves. We as Christians are not immune from sin. After we become Christians, we still need to approach the throne of mercy and grace to ask for forgiveness of our sins. That is what this verse is teaching. It is not saying anything about the spiritual condition of infants.

Romans 7: Paul’s Conflict Under Law

For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin. 15 For what I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate. 16 But if I do the very thing I do not want to do, I agree with the Law, confessing that the Law is good. 17 So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me. 18 For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the willing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not. 19 For the good that I want, I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want. 20 But if I am doing the very thing I do not want, I am no longer the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me. 21 I find then the principle that evil is present in me, the one who wants to do good. 22 For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man, 23 but I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members. 24 Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death? 25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I myself with my mind am serving the law of God, but on the other, with my flesh the law of sin.” (Romans 7:14-25).

Paul begins this chapter by showing that Christians are no longer under the jurisdiction of the Law because of our dying with Christ. We have died to the law so we can bear good fruit for God (v4). In the following verses, Paul shows how the law puts one into bondage, and how it is only through Jesus we can be freed from the bondage that the Law puts us under (v25). We, left to ourselves, will never be able to obey the law perfectly. To point to it as where we will gain righteousness only brings condemnation to ourselves. This seems to be the point of the text.

With this said, Paul is talking about a man who is under the law. Because he knew the law that says, “do not covet,” he had produced within him all kinds of coveting. This is what trying to practice the law leads to. The one question I have is this, where are infants mentioned in this passage. Paul says that “nothing good” dwells in him” as a man under the law, but he nowhere in this text mentions that babies are in the same boat. This is assumed into the text by proponents of the original sin doctrine, just as in many of the other verses that this article examines in context.

Romans 5 Commentary

This text is a central text in the debate over the doctrine of original sin/total inherited depravity.

12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned

This verse does not say that sin was imputed by death. Because of Adam’s sin, everyone will die. There is debate if this is talking about physical or spiritual death. I presently believe it is talking about spiritual death.

Death spreads to all men not because they were born as sinners, but because all men sinned!

13 for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law.

Sin was in the world before the law of Moses was given. All men have the law written in their hearts (Rom 2:14-15) and disobey God who puts it there.

14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.

We sinned (v12), but not the exact sin as Adam. (remember also, sin and death reign over us because we practice sin. This is what makes us slaves – Rom 6:12-20)

15 But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many.

Throughout this text, I will keep a consistent interpretation. The text is contrasting the results of Adam’s one single act impacted everyone who sins. The single act of Christ on the cross has a impact on all those who believe the gospel.

16 And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification.

Both of these acts had far reaching consequences. The consequence of Adam’s sin was that condemnation/death spread to all men (because all sinned – v12). The consequence of Jesus’ sacrifice brought justification to men who sinned.

17 If, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.

Once again, death reigned because of Adam’s sin and our following in his steps by sinning (v12). Christ’s sacrifice brings the gift of eternal life to those who believe (Rom 1:16).

18 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men.

One sin led to the condemnation of all men who sinned (v12). Jesus’ one act of righteousness led all who believe to be justified and to have life.

19 For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.

Adam’s one sin led all to be made sinners. Once sin entered the world, there was no keeping every man from sin (all sinned v12, Rom 3:23). Jesus’ obedience leads those who believe to be made righteous.

20 Now the law came in to increase the trespass, but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more,

The law cam to show men the depth of their sin against God, but also to show the depth of the grace God is willing to give those who believe.

21 so that, as sin reigned in death, grace also might reign through righteousness leading to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Sin ‘reigned’ by bringing death to all who sinned (v12). Grace reigns and brings righteousness through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ.

As you see, Romans 5:12-21 does not teach that the sin of Adam was imputed to us. We need to interpret it based on what has already been said within the book of Romans; that all men sin and are guilty before God (chs. 2-3), and can saved and justified by faith in the blood of Christ. This specific text opens up the same way in verse 12 when it says that death spread to all men because all sinned. This makes the most sense of the passage to me.

1 Corinthians 15:21-23

“But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21 For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.”

I disagree with how many people interpret this verse in trying to use it to refer to a spiritual death that comes to all men because of Adam’s sin. This, to me, completely disregards the context of the passage. The whole context is referring to the physical resurrection of Christ. It shows that because we know that Christ was raised from His tomb, we will be also when He returns. This text is not talking about the spiritual death that Adam’s sin brought into the world, but physical death. The text is teaching about the physical resurrection of Christ and believers and the physical death that was brought about by Adam’s sin and men losing access to the tree of life.

Early Christian Teachings on the Nature of Man1

I will just quote the early church fathers (Pre-Nicene Fathers) without any commentary so you can see for yourself what they believed about the nature of man. You may be surprised that it was not until the time of Augustine in the AD400s  that being born sinners was taught as universal doctrine in the church. The opposite was taught until then.

“Therefore, the prophets used to exhort men to do what was good, to act justly and to work righteousness…because it is in our power to do so.” Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.519

“God has created us naturally social and just.” Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.307.

“Let them not then say that he who does wrong and sins, transgresses because of demons. For then he would be guiltless. Instead, a person becomes a demoniac man by choosing the same things as do the demons: by sinning and being unstable, frivolous, and fickle in his desires – just like a demon. Now he who is bad (having become sinful by nature, because of evil) becomes depraved. He has what he has chosen. And, being sinful, he sins also in his actions. Likewise, the good man does right.” Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.502.

“Entire freedom of will, therefore, was conferred upon man in both tendencies. So that, as master of himself, he might constantly encounter good by the observance of it, and evil by its spontaneous observance of it…But the recompense for good and could not be given to the man who is found to have been either good or evil through necessity, and not choice.” Tertullian (c. 207, W), 3.315.

“Is not [the doctrine of the Gnostics] from the beginning and everywhere an invective against the flesh? Their doctrine is against its origin, its substance, its casualties, ant the invariable end that awaits it. According to them, it is unclean from its first formation of the dregs of the ground. It is even more unclean afterwards from the mire of its own seminal transmission. According to them, it is worthless, weak, covered with guilt, laden with misery, full of trouble.” Tertullian (c. 210, W),3.548.

“It is evident from all this that no one is pure either by essence or by nature. And no one is polluted by nature. The consequence of this is that it lies within ourselves and in our actions to either possess happiness and holiness, or by sloth and negligence to fall from happiness into wickedness and ruin…” Origen (c. 225, E),4.260.

“There is no rational creature that is not capable of good and evil. Origen (c. 225, E), 4.265.

“A man may possess an acquired righteousness, from which it is possible for him to fall away.” Origen (c. 225, E), 4.265).

“Certain men who hold different opinions [i.e., heretics] misuse these passages. They destroy free will by introducing ruined natures incapable of salvation and by introducing others as being saved in such a way that they cannot be lost. Origen (c. 225, E), 4.308.

“Let us use the following illustration from the gospel. There is a certain rock with only a little surface soil. If seeds fall upon it, they quickly spring up. But not having root, when they spring up, they are burned and withered when the sun rises. Now, this rock is  human soil, hardened on the account of its neglect. It has become a stone because of its wickedness. For no one receives from God a heart created of stone. Rather, it becomes such a heart because of wickedness. Origen (c. 225, E), 4.314.

“We, however, who know of only one nature in every rational soul, maintain that no one has been created evil by the Author of all things. Rather, many have become wicked through education, perverse example, and surrounding influences.” Origen (c. 248, E), 4.491.

“Nobody can be born vicious. Instead, if we make a bad use of the affections, they become vices. If we use them well, they become virtues. Lactanius (c. 304-313, W), 7.181.

“The Son clothed Himself with flesh so that – the desires of the flesh being subdued – He might teach us that to sin was not the result of necessity, but of man’s purpose and will.” Lactanius (c. 304-313, W), 7.127.


What do you think? I am sure there will be many people that disagree with the conclusions that I have come to from my study of scripture. I look forward to hearing any thoughts you may have. All I have attempted to do in this study is show what I have gotten from the scriptures in my own studies. I did not reference any commentaries from either side of the issue as I wrote this article. I just looked at each verse in its context and interpreted it. If you disagree, I would love to hear from you so I can test these conclusions that I came to.

 

1. all early Christian quotes from A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs by David W. Bercot, Editor

The Deity of Christ: Sermon Outline

Here is a sermon I am preaching today on the Deity of Jesus Christ. Picture1

The Deity of Jesus Christ

Are you worshiping and serving the Jesus of the Bible?

You can find the audio here.

Ticket to Heaven Tract

Do you have a friend that thinks they are a good person and their good works will be their ticket to Heaven? Here’s the tract for you!

 

Ticket to Heaven (Click on Picture for Files)

Ticket to Heaven

 

Back of Card:

Most people think their ticket to Heaven is to be a good person.  Would you consider yourself a good person? Have you ever lied? Looked with lust? Hated someone? Stolen? Taken God’s name in vain? If you have done these things once, then you are a liar, an adulterer (Matt. 5:28), a murderer (1 John 3:15), a thief, and a blasphemer (not a good person). God will not overlook your crimes. You are deserving of God’s wrath in His eternal prison of Hell. But this is not what He desires for you. God sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to this earth to be a sacrifice for your sins. He died for you and was raised from His tomb by God so you can have the hope of eternal life. If you believe this message (the Gospel), submit to Jesus Christ,  and turn from your sins, God will raise you out of the hopeless state of death you are in, wash away your sins, and give you new life (Ephesians 2:1-10; Romans 6:1-7; Colossians 2:11-14).

 

 

 

Sermon: The Grace of God

The grace of God is one of the most misunderstood and abused topics about the attributes of God, especially when it comes to the debate over grace versus works. This sermon examines what the grace of God is and shows how God (instead of man) is deserving of all the glory when it comes to their receiving salvation. I challenged some common misconceptions that “Christians” have about grace, one being that there are no conditions that we must fulfill to receive the grace of God; the other being that we must do works to merit eternal life. There is a middle ground between these two that is correct. Listen and let me know if you agree or disagree.

 

The Grace of God     MP3     PowerPoint

 

 

The Book of Mormon: Is it the Word of God?

The book of Mormon is a book that claims to tell the history of 3 groups of people from ancient America, two groups, the Nephites and the Lamanites, that came from the city of Jerusalem around 600bc before the Babylonians destroyed the city. The third group, the Jaredites supposedly came from the tower of Babel after God confused the languages. Interwoven in this book is the supposed personal ministry and appearances of Jesus Christ to the inhabitants of America after His resurrection and ascension in ad34.

In September 1823, Joseph Smith was supposedly visited by a heavenly messenger named Moroni. Moroni informed Joseph that God had a work for him to do and told him that a record of the ancient inhabitants of the American continent was buried in a nearby hill.  He stated that the record contained the fullness of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Joseph Smith later retrieves these gold plates and translates them into English by the inspiration of God. (remember this point for later)

David Whitmer, one of the three witnesses to the Book of Mormon, made this statement about how the book of Mormon was translated:

"I will now give you a description of the manner in which the Book of Mormon was translated. Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English." [1]

Oliver B. Huntington recorded in his journal that in 1881 Joseph F. Smith, who became the sixth President of the Mormon Church, taught that the Lord gave Joseph Smith the exact English wording and spelling that he should use in the Book of Mormon:

"Saturday Feb. 25, 1881, I …. Heard Joseph F. Smith describe the manner of translating the Book of Mormon by Joseph Smith the Prophet and Seer, which was as follows as near as I can recollect the substance of his description. Joseph did not render the writing on the gold plates into the English language in his own style of language as many people believe, but every word and every letter was given to him by the gift and power of God. So it is the work of God and not of Joseph Smith, and it was done in this way … . The Lord caused each word spelled as it is in the book to appear on the stones in short sentences or words, and when Joseph had uttered the sentence or word before him and the scribe had written it properly, that sentence would disappear and another appear. And if there was a word wrongly written or even a letter incorrect the writing on the stones would remain there. Then Joseph would require the scribe to spell the reading of the last spoken and thus find the mistake and when corrected the sentence would disappear as usual.” [2]

Just one more quote; this one from Joseph Smith himself:

“I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book.” [3]

Are these claims about the book of Mormon true? Is it the word of God? If so, we would expect it to be in perfect harmony with the bible, which they claim it is, and that there would be no mistakes within it if it was translated word for word by the inspiration of God from the original language of reformed Egyptian into English. Is this the case?

DOES THE BOOK OF MORMON CLAIM TO BE INSPIRED?

There are many places in our bible where the writers by the Spirit claimed to be writing the words and commandments of God. Is this how the book of Mormon is? Does it speak with the authority that our scriptures do? I believe that it does not, and I have 7 verses from the Book of Mormon to show this:

1 Nephi 1:1 “And I know that the record which I make is true; and I make it with mine own hand; and I make it according to my knowledge.”[4]

1 Nephi 19:6Nevertheless, I do not write anything upon the plates save it be that I think it be sacred. And now, if I do err, even did they err of old; not that I would excuse myself because of other men, but because of the weakness which is in me, according to the flesh, I would excuse myself.” [5]

Jacob 1:2 “And he gave me, Jacob, a commandment that I should write upon these plates a few of the things which I considered to be most precious…” [6]

Jacob 7:26…and the record of this people being kept on the other plates of Nephi, wherefore, I conclude this record declaring that I have written according to the best of my knowledge…” [7]

Ether 5:1And now I, Moroni, have written the words which were commanded me, according to my memory; and I have told you the things which I have sealed up…” [8]

Mormon 8:12 “And whoso receiveth this record, and shall not condemn it because of the imperfections which are in it, the same shall know of greater things than these…” [9]

Mormon 9:33 “…and if we could have written in Hebrew, behold, ye would have had no imperfections in our record.” [10]

Internal evidence from the authors shows that they were not writing for god, but for their selves from their memories (with mistakes) Not quite a claim of divine origin.

Even the introduction of the Book of Mormon claims that it has mistakes! READ

Have any changes been made to the book of Mormon since it’s original writing in 1830?

I don’t have enough time to share with you all of the changes that have been made in the book of Mormon since it was supposedly translated by the power of God. Over 3000 names, words, and places have been changed since the original writing in 1830. Some of these do and do not change the meaning of passages. I’ll just mention one change that was made. In Mosiah 21:28, the original edition speaks of a man named King Benjamin. The interesting thing is that he actually died 15 chapters earlier in the book of Mosiah! It was changed in the 2nd edition to King Mosiah.[11] Which edition was right, was it the original one that was translated by the power of God, or was the change right?

Does the book of Mormon contradict the bible? It does in many texts.

In Alma 7:9-10, the book of Mormon reads: “…the kingdom of Heaven is at hand, and the Son of God cometh upon the face of the earth. And behold, He shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem, which is the Land of our forefathers (Emphasis added).”[12] A prophecy, dated at about 83bc in the book of Mormon claims that Jesus would be born in Jerusalem! Where does the bible say Jesus was born? Bethlehem. Mormons look at the word “at” and say that it means “near” or “around.” But the context shows that this is not the case. Alma, who was a Nephite, wrote in 1 Nephi 1:4-5 that the land of their forefathers was the CITY of Jerusalem, which is what the text in question says of Jerusalem. Alma 7:9-10 is clearly saying that Jesus was born in Jerusalem. This is false.

1 Nephi 19:45; Heleman 14:27 Says that there were three days of darkness in Israel when Jesus died? The Bible says in Luke 23:44, “Now it was about the sixth hour, and there was darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour.” There were only three hours of darkness. Which one is right?

Mosiah 18:17 (pg 182) The Church of Christ already in 147 bc? That’s about 180 yrs too early!

Alma 27:27 (pg277) People have a firm faith in Christ in 90-77bc?

Alma 46:11-21 (pg 323) Christians in 73bc. Christians were so called first at Antioch (Acts 11:26, aprox. 40ad)

Contradiction to common sense:

Ether 15:30 “And it came to pass that when Coriantumr had leaned upon his sword, that he rested a little, he smote off the head of Shiz.” (DECAPITATION) “And it came to pass that after he had smitten off the head of Shiz, that Shiz raised up on his hands and fell; and after that he had struggled for breath, he died.”[13]

The claim of Joseph Smith that the book of Mormon is the greatest and most correct of any book ever written has no evidence to back it up. After over 150 years after the writing of the book of Mormon, no city named in the book of Mormon has been found, no names from the book of Mormon have been found in New World inscriptions from archaeology. No ancient copies of the book of Mormon have been found. Considering that this book was copied during its’ supposed writing in between 600bc and 400ad, we would think that we would find older copies in the Americas. There is not one bit of archaeological evidence that proves the book of Mormon is true.

Joseph Smith, the Mormon church, and the book of Mormon clearly teach a different gospel than the one delivered by the Apostles. They teach something very different from the faith once for all delivered to the saints.

“But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed” (Gal 1:8).


[1] An Address to All Believers in Christ, by David Whitmer, 1887, page 12

[2] Journal of Oliver B. Huntington, page 168 of typed copy at Utah State Historical Society

[3] History of the Church: Joseph Smith, Vol. 4, p. 461, November 1841

[4] Smith, Joseph. The Book of Mormon. Salt Lake City, UT: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1921. Print.

[5] ibid.

[6] ibid.

[7] ibid.

[8] ibid.

[9] ibid.

[10] ibid.

[11] fairmormon.org

[12] Smith, Joseph. The Book of Mormon. Salt Lake City, UT: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1921. Print.

[13] ibid.

The One and Only Gospel

The Bible is not just any book that we are studying, it is the word of God. And what it says goes. If the Bible teaches something, and we are unwilling to do what it says, we should not be comfortable thinking that we are going to be blessed by God. If we believe or teach something that contradicts what God says, we need to repent and believe and practice the truth.

This is especially true when it comes to the subject that I am dealing with this post. It is what Paul refers to as being “of first importance. In 1 Corinthians 15:1-3.

“Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain. 3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received…”

This message that Paul delivered to the Corinthians is the message that is the foundation in which their faith is built upon; and the message that saves them. This message is the Gospel.

The Gospel is really the Big Picture of what the Bible is about. It is the reason why God created everything; so He through Jesus Christ could save sinners and be in a relationship with them. Based on this, we need to make sure of one thing in this life: we must get this message right. If we teach or believe a different Gospel than the Bible gives us, we will not make it to Heaven.

“But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!” -Galatians 1:8

Paul is saying that if anyone teaches a different gospel, let him be accursed, which means to be eternally condemned by God. My brothers and sisters, this is serious stuff!

“Jesus will come “in flaming fire, dealing out retribution to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.” -2 Thessalonians 1:7-9

Where we and those we teach spend eternity depends on it. There is only one gospel; one message of good news that saves sinners from the wrath of a Holy God.

So what is this Gospel that saves sinners? Where do we begin? When we examine the New Testament, especially the Gospels and the book of Acts, we see that there are a few core elements of the Gospel that need to be taught to lost people.

1. They are in a sinful, hopeless state

2. They are God’s enemies, and subject to His wrath

3. God provided a way of salvation

4. Sinners must respond to the Gospel on God’s terms

 

Sermon: The Power of God

Here is a sermon that I preached on Aug 5 on the power and sovereignty of God

The Power of God

During the sermon, I share the below video from Francis Chan to show God’s power seen in His amazing creation.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpChZxPfa-c&w=480&h=360]

The Almighty Jesus Christ?

Whenever we hear the word “Almighty,” Who do we usually think about. Do we usually only think about the Father, or do we think about Jesus Christ also?

AMONG-LAMPSTANDSThis may or may not surprise you, but the scriptures do say that Jesus is “Almighty.” This is much to the dismay of the Jehovah’s Witnesses who teach that Jesus is not God. (They do not speak for Jehovah, so I will refer to them only as “Witnesses” from now on)

A popular verse that shows the deity of Christ is Isaiah 9:6, which is a prophecy about Jesus that calls Him the “Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.” Witnesses usually have a quick comeback to this verse that says, “Jesus is not called the “Almighty God,” but only the “Mighty God.” They miss the fact that there are at least two references of God the Father in the Old Testament that refer to Him as the “Mighty God” also (Isaiah 10:21, Jeremiah 32:18).

Nonetheless, there is a verse that refers to Jesus as the Almighty. It is Revelation 1:8:

“I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.”

The Witnesses may respond by saying that the context does not demand that this is a reference to Jesus; that this is not Him speaking. But the rest of the book shows us clearly who the Alpha and Omega is talking about. Jesus calls Himself the first and the last in Rev. 1:17 and 2:28, which means the same thing as “the Alpha and the Omega. But Revelation 22:12-16 makes it clear who the Almighty Alpha and Omega is.

“Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done. 13I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” 14 Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter by the gates into the city. 15 Outside are the dogs and the sorcerers and the immoral persons and the murderers and the idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lying. 16I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things for the churches.” (Revelation 22:12-16)

The Book of Revelation reveals that Jesus is the Alpha and Omega, the Almighty. Whenever the scriptures speak of the Almighty God, we need to train ourselves to see the whole Godhead in that statement. The name of God, Yahweh or Jehovah, refers to the whole Godhead in scripture. The next article I write will show that Jesus is referred to as Jehovah (or Yahweh) in scripture.

Works Cited

Photo from http://calvarychapelofwm.com/2010/06/16/revelation-1-part-2/